Did General McChrystal Fall On His Sword?
This week, the resignation of Gen. McChrystal as the Commander, Allied Forces in Afghanistan rocked the nation and the world. Though some believe that his departure was too high a price to pay for being politically incorrect, we must remember that the military operates by law under a very different set of rules than the civilian world. Whether or not the current occupant of the White House is deserving of ridicule or disrespect, the Office of the Presidency is not. The rules governing our military were established to ensure that the civilian branch of government remains in complete control of the military. There are many examples of why our Founding Fathers established this hierarchy, both historically and in our present day world as well.
That said, the question must be asked, “Why did a 4-star General with a distinguished career knowingly allow a left-wing paper to observe and publish an exchange that cost him his career?” It is becoming increasingly clear that the war in Afghanistan is not going according to our plan or our schedule. The Obama administration is chock-full of academics and public sector “clingons” who have absolutely no experience in or with the military. And fewer than 1 in 5 members of the US House and Senate ever served in our Armed Forces. In the military, words such as integrity, honor, and duty have real meaning. And breakdowns in those values have very real, and deadly, consequences – both for the individual members and for our nation.
Was General McChrystal signaling that he was tired of fighting a counter-insurgency war where our troops cannot shoot back, use artillery or call in airstrikes if there’s any chance of a civilian casualty? Think about these rules of engagement as we fight a war against an enemy that wears no uniform, hides in schools, hospitals, mosques and marketplaces, knows no allegiance to any nation, and is well-funded and very technologically capable.
Was he tired of sending our troops home in caskets because this Commander-in-Chief, having never held any positions of executive responsibility in his life, has absolutely no idea of how to make strategic decisions with anything other than concern for his plummeting political fortunes?
Accepting General McChrystal’s resignation was the correct thing to do. But we have to ask ourselves why a courageous, talented lifelong soldier ended his career in the midst of a very tough war, after being hand-picked by this President to wage it.

With kind words, time and a smile almost anybody can be sold their own noose, especially when the world that surrounds you is harsh. His offence is very forgivable however for the good the mission the right choice was made. Unfortunate.
General McCrystal is a soldier's soldier and without a doubt each morning he was handed a casualty report listing of not only American dead and wounded but coalition and Afganistan dead and wounded leaving much blood on his hands. His pleas to the Oval office landed on deaf ears and after much cajoling and nearly 2-4 months further delays he received a scant allocation of the additional troops he was requiring to do the job. Further added insult to injury was added to this where his United State and coalition forces were denied adequate air supporting coverage when needed.....more dead and casualties resulting. Would I have done the same thing if I were in his shoes and my commnader in chief were not giving me the necessary tools to lead my men and women into battle to win but rather to lead my men and women into a slaugher pen? Without a doubt.....that is what any leader will do if he/she is to lead men and women into battle!
The very same battle stype existed when I was inVietnam in 1965. I would be on patrol and our unit would come under enemy contact and it was necessary to radio to the rear echelon for permission to return fire! And many times this request would have to be sent clear to Washington DC for approval! At times this request was denied and we had to just wait it out until the hidden enemy dispersed.
Regards - Gary A. Gahan
Post new comment